Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 15:09

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Is it wise to SECRETLY expose a narcissist by telling others that he/she is a covert narcissist?
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Scientists Stumble Upon The World’s Oldest Stomach Stone Fossil - The Daily Galaxy
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
$200 for a Refurbished MacBook Air Is a Tough Deal to Beat - PCMag
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Mundfish Reveals The Cube, An MMORPG Shooter Set In The Atomic Heart Universe - Game Informer
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Cher’s Son Elijah Blue Allman Hospitalized After ‘Acting Erratically’ - Rolling Stone
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.